Intel will fab ARM chips on upcoming 10nm foundry node

Intel Foundry

When Intel announced that it was canceling its tablet and smartphone products and effectively exiting the Android-x86 market, it was generally seen as a sign that the company had given up on attempting to compete against low-power ARM products manufactured by Samsung, TSMC, and GlobalFoundries. Now Intel announced that it would begin building 10nm hardware for companies that want to license standard ARM cores.

ARM and Intel released joint blog posts with additional information. According to ARM, this deal will cover future ARM products, dubbed ARM POP technology (POP is not an acronym). ARM writes:

Meanwhile, Intel’s post notes that it has been collaborating with companies like ANSYS, Cadence, Mentor Graphics, and Synopsys to build advanced IP tools for customers, as well as working with ARM to bring its products over to Intel’s 10nm node. Intel writes:

LG is the only customer currently confirmed for Intel’s 10nm node, and this deal seems limited to companies that want to build standard ARM cores as opposed to designing custom architectures to be built on Intel’s fabs, like Qualcomm or Apple.

Hell hasn’t frozen over, but it’s chilly this week

Intel’s decision to start fabbing hardware for ARM customers isn’t as surprising as it would’ve been this time last year, before it killed its tablet and smartphone Atom cores. Building hardware for the companies you intend to compete against is an obvious conflict of interest that wouldn’t have sat well with Chipzilla or its ARM customers. Now that Intel is out of the smartphone and tablet business, building chips for other companies is a logical step to take. Intel still retains a license to design its own ARM cores should it ever decide to do so, and it’ll be interesting to see what happens as a result of its entry into the ARM business. In theory, adopting Intel’s 10nm technology could give LG a leg up on its competitors.


Intel, TSMC, and Samsung feature sizes at 14nm. Intel leads the market, but can it translate that leadership to advantages for its customers?

It’s worth noting, however, that Intel’s previous foundry partnerships don’t seem to have resulted in any high-profile success stories. Altera signed an agreement to build FPGAs with Intel before Intel acquired them outright, but it’s not clear if doing so bought Altera any significant capabilities compared to its primary competitor, Xilinx. Spreadtrum, Intel’s other 14nm partner, is a low-end Chinese fabless semiconductor company. LG is the highest-profile win that Intel has secured, though the company’s smartphone sales have not been good in recent years.

One rumor we’ve heard in the past is that while Intel’s foundry technology is second to none, it’s also tuned and designed specifically for Intel’s own design rules. Presumably the Custom Foundry business has been either moving away from this approach — giving Intel more generic capacity that would allow it to compete effectively against the likes of TSMC, GlobalFoundries and Samsung — or has found a way to make it easier for companies to come in and build chips on its own technology. Pricing constraints and fab costs were a major problem for Intel when competing against ARM with its own Atom processors, and it’ll have to hit some aggressive price targets to build hardware for third parties that can compete effectively.

Exact details on all these points is obviously confidential, but it’ll be fascinating to see if LG’s future chips are measurably more power efficient or faster than their 10nm counterparts built at other foundries. This kind of comparison could give us the first apples-to-apples comparison of Intel’s foundry prowess against its competitors that we’ve ever seen.

Post Author: Tech Review